More Ballet ≠ Better Ballet

Why early specialisation could be holding your dancer back


"If my child wants to become a professional dancer, shouldn't we be doing as much ballet as possible now?"

It sounds logical. More hours → more practice → better technique → better dancer.

But children's development doesn't work quite that neatly. More training isn't automatically better training. And more ballet isn't necessarily the same thing as better preparation for a career in dance. In fact, the research on youth athletic development tells a more nuanced and reassuring story (Australian Institute of Sport [AIS], 2022).

What is early specialisation?

Early specialisation means intensive, year-round participation in one activity, often before puberty, with little opportunity for other forms of physical activity (AIS, 2022). 

It's worth drawing a distinction here, because it matters: early exposure isn't the same as early specialisation.

A child dancing ballet at six isn't necessarily "specialising." A child dancing ballet six days a week, year-round, while not participating in swimming, gymnastics, athletics, climbing or simply playing outside, is in a very different situation, whether that’s due to influence from parents or dance teachers, or a lack of free time. This isn't an argument against children doing lots of ballet, it's an argument for making sure ballet isn't the only thing they do.

Why the body needs variety

A developing body benefits from varied movement and appropriately managed loading, rather than excessive repetitive loading from a single activity. Growth plates, tendons, bones and muscles are all still maturing, and repetitive movement in a single pattern, without other movement experiences to balance it, increases the risk of overuse injury (Bell et al., 2018).

Movement variety is training too. Running, jumping, climbing, throwing, swimming, riding bikes, playing games, these expose children to different forces, coordination demands, balance challenges and spatial awareness. Those aren't wasted hours. They're building the broader movement vocabulary a dancer eventually draws on.

The Australian Institute of Sport includes a useful guideline: organised sport and training hours per week should not exceed a child's age (AIS, 2022). An eight-year-old, for example, would generally not be advised to undertake more than eight hours of organised sport and training per week across all activities. This isn't a rigid prescription for every child, and dance sits in a slightly unique space between sport and performing art, but it provides a useful way to think about overall training load. 

Excessive training loads in a young, still-developing body don't produce better dancers. They generally produce injured, burnt-out ones. The broader message is that more hours shouldn't automatically be assumed to produce better outcomes, particularly when those hours come at the expense of recovery, variety and free play.

What happens when ballet becomes the whole identity?

Beyond the physical risks, early intensive specialisation can also have psychological and social consequences, including burnout, reduced enjoyment and increased pressure. It can also contribute to what researchers describe as identity foreclosure: committing to an identity before having the opportunity to meaningfully explore other possibilities (Petitipas & France, 2012). 

If a child grows up believing I am a dancer, rather than I love dancing, then an injury, a rejection, a plateau, or simply a change in interests becomes far more threatening to their sense of self. Additionally, children are allowed to change their minds. That's an important message, not just for dancers, but for the adults around them.

But what about becoming a professional dancer?

This is where a lot of parents will, understandably, push back. Professional dancers do train a lot. That's true.

But the real question isn't do professional dancers train a lot, it's when should that training load increase, and what should it look like along the way?

Research increasingly challenges the assumption that maximising sport-specific training from early childhood is the most effective route to elite performance (Bell et al., 2018). Early diversification, trying a range of sports and movement forms before specialising, is associated with fewer injuries and longer participation, and may support eventual elite performance in many sports, and comes with added physical, cognitive and psychosocial benefits along the way (Bell et al., 2018; Jayanthi et al., 2013). Put simply: a child who develops a broad physical foundation through gymnastics, swimming, soccer, play and dance may be better positioned for long-term development than a child whose entire physical development has been built around one highly specialised activity.

The dance-specific piece

Ballet isn't quite the same as team sport, and there are reasons dancers need years of preparation, pointe work being an obvious example. You can't decide at 16 to become a professional dancer and expect to build the necessary technique in two years.

So we're not arguing against early, consistent ballet training. We're arguing against consistent training with early exclusive specialisation. A child can train ballet consistently while still having other physical activities, adequate recovery, unstructured play, and time away from the studio.

Alongside structured classes, we'd encourage all young dancers to make room for what researchers call deliberate play: unstructured or self-directed physical activity where the goal is simply to move, explore and have fun, whether that's dancing around the living room or a backyard game of soccer (Gullich et al., 2023; Jayanthi et al., 2013). This kind of unorganised, pressure-free movement supports motivation and creativity in a way that structured training alone can't replicate.

Increasing load, gradually

When it is time for a dancer's hours to increase, that should happen gradually (Matos, 2021). A growing, adolescent body needs time to adapt to increases in physical demand. Rapid increases in training load can contribute to fatigue and increased injury risk (Bell et al., 2018; Whitaker, 2015). There isn't one perfect progression that applies to every dancer. Training increases should take into account age, maturation, current workload, experience, recovery, health and the demands of the new training environment. When needed, a physiotherapist or other appropriately qualified professional can help guide that progression. 

What parents can actually do

Instead of asking how many hours of ballet should my child be doing, it's worth asking instead: what does my child need developmentally right now?

A few questions worth sitting with:

  • Are they still enjoying dancing?

  • Are they getting enough recovery?

  • Do they take part in other physical activities?

  • Does their schedule leave room for unstructured play and simply being a child? 

  • Is their training increasing gradually, not suddenly?

  • Are they regularly experiencing pain?

  • Is ballet crowding out sleep, school, friends or play?

  • Are they choosing ballet or feeling pressured into it?

  • Does their teacher talk about development, rather than urgency?

The bottom line

We don't need to rush childhood to create professional dancers. A professional career is built over years, not accumulated in a rush of hours before a dancer turns 12.

The goal isn't to keep young dancers from ever specialising. It's to make sure that when specialisation happens, it happens with appropriate physical, psychological and developmental foundations underneath it. A strong, adaptable, physically capable, and psychologically healthy dancer is one who can keep progressing for years to come.

Sometimes the best thing you can do for a future professional dancer is let them be a child today.

Next
Next

Performative Wellbeing: Illusion or Practice?